Beware of Creedence22, Scott Douglas. This trade is well document with all the screenshots so Creedence22 cannot slither out of being accountable for his misrepresentation. What is disturbing is when I confronted him about the dishonest deal he blamed me for picking the firearm and then justified himself by saying he’s made bad deals, too. So I just should accept it? Not a chance. I would never have said yes to the deal had he told me it needed a major sophisticated repair. I traded him a flawless firearm for a firearm that was advertised as “original and needing nothing.” But that is not what I got. With due diligence, prior to completing the deal, I asked detailed condition questions, including: is it original, what dues it need and is there anything I need to know about this firearm? The seller, Scott Douglas, stated no and that it needed nothing. He also promised extra parts he would throw in to sweeten the deal and make it even more likely I would do the trade. He really wanted my rifle for his Enfield. After receiving the firearm, I was informed by Lee Enfield collector associates that it was altered from its original configuration and required a significant repair. The repair was a break that was hidden by masking tape holding the bottom forestock stock together as it lacked barrel bands. After I received the Enfield the seller then provided aDIY repair guide suited for an experienced craftsman because I complained it was broke. He also did not follow through on a promise to send extra parts. He then claimed I knew it all Ali g but never produced any evidence of he was truthful. But I kept a full record of texts and messages from GunPost. Finally he just said, fine go ahead and post a bad review. I couldn’t care less. GunPost isn’t going to do anything about it. Big deal. I have screenshots of the full conversation documenting what was represented before shipment versus what was disclosed afterward if you want to see them. I want to prevent him from slithering out of accountability and disappointing any other GunPost users. This is my second trade. The first was perfect on both sides. But it takes complete honesty. That was my experience. It might be yours, too .
Based on this experience, I would not trade with this seller again. Buyers should verify originality, request detailed condition photos, and avoid relying on promises that parts will be sent later.
Reviews
Beware of Creedence22, Scott Douglas. This trade is well document with all the screenshots so Creedence22 cannot slither out of being accountable for his misrepresentation. What is disturbing is when I confronted him about the dishonest deal he blamed me for picking the firearm and then justified himself by saying he’s made bad deals, too. So I just should accept it? Not a chance. I would never have said yes to the deal had he told me it needed a major sophisticated repair.
I traded him a flawless firearm for a firearm that was advertised as “original and needing nothing.” But that is not what I got.
With due diligence, prior to completing the deal, I asked detailed condition questions, including: is it original, what dues it need and is there anything I need to know about this firearm? The seller, Scott Douglas, stated no and that it needed nothing. He also promised extra parts he would throw in to sweeten the deal and make it even more likely I would do the trade. He really wanted my rifle for his Enfield.
After receiving the firearm, I was informed by Lee Enfield collector associates that it was altered from its original configuration and required a significant repair. The repair was a break that was hidden by masking tape holding the bottom forestock stock together as it lacked barrel bands. After I received the Enfield the seller then provided aDIY repair guide suited for an experienced craftsman because I complained it was broke. He also did not follow through on a promise to send extra parts.
He then claimed I knew it all Ali g but never produced any evidence of he was truthful. But I kept a full record of texts and messages from GunPost. Finally he just said, fine go ahead and post a bad review. I couldn’t care less. GunPost isn’t going to do anything about it. Big deal.
I have screenshots of the full conversation documenting what was represented before shipment versus what was disclosed afterward if you want to see them. I want to prevent him from slithering out of accountability and disappointing any other GunPost users.
This is my second trade. The first was perfect on both sides. But it takes complete honesty.
That was my experience. It might be yours, too .
Based on this experience, I would not trade with this seller again. Buyers should verify originality, request detailed condition photos, and avoid relying on promises that parts will be sent later.
Good, clear, straightforward communication
great to deal with discription was bang on
Did a trade with him, rifle was exactly as described, was shipped safely and quickly. Would deal with again! A+++++
Great communicator, fast payment, a top notch gentleman to work with. Deal with confidence
Very good to deal with.
Great communication throughout the entire sales process, easy to deal with, no issues with payment, would deal with him again on here!
I'm his First Review, but deal went really fast and easy sent pictures of package everything looks good would deal from again 10/10